Knowledge Base

INdustry

Risk intelligence in payment systems

Solutions

Quick Start
Product & Capabilities
Comparison & Alternatives
Implementation & Integration
Coverage & Sources
Users & Use Cases
Support & Operations
Security, Compliance & Legal

Risk Intelligence in Payment Systems

Q1. Why does regulatory risk intelligence matter so much for global payment systems in 2025?

Payments don’t just stop at borders. Networks like SWIFT, SEPA, and FedNow link dozens of countries, and a single rule change in one place can cause a ripple effect across the globe. If you miss an update in Frankfurt, for instance, you could find payment channels suddenly frozen in Toronto or Singapore the next day. This isn't a theoretical risk. In 2024, several European banks were caught off guard when they overlooked a key ECB sanctions update. That scramble cost them time, money, and a hit to their reputation. The lesson is clear: regulatory intelligence isn't a "nice-to-have"—it's a critical piece of the infrastructure itself.

Q2. What makes it so hard to monitor rules across APAC, EMEA, and the Americas?

The real challenge isn't finding the information, it's managing the overwhelming flood of it. Every regulator does things differently. The ECB uses structured XML feeds, Canada's FINTRAC offers APIs, but many regulators in the Asia-Pacific region still rely on publishing everything in PDFs. On top of that, you have translation delays—updates from Japan or Brazil are often released in local languages first—and inconsistent timing. U.S. regulators post during the week, while some in APAC might drop updates on weekends. Without round-the-clock monitoring, you'll always be playing catch-up.

Q3. How often should financial institutions capture regulatory updates?

Daily monitoring is the bare minimum. The smartest firms treat critical alerts, especially sanctions and fraud warnings, as real-time signals. In practice, this means:

Real-time for sanctions and security alerts‍
Daily for general bulletins‍
Weekly for executive summaries‍
Monthly for high-level trend reviews

One survey found that 87% of major Tier 1 banks now use continuous monitoring. The firms that only check once a week admitted they missed several urgent updates every month.

Q4. Which regulators act as bellwethers globally?

The European Central Bank (ECB) and the U.S. Federal Reserve are the major global influencers. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is a leader in digital assets, while the UK's FCA sets the tone for consumer protection. Other key players include the Bank of Canada on instant payments, the Reserve Bank of Australia on real-time systems, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority on central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots. Keeping an eye on these bodies can give you a 12 to 18-month head start on what’s coming next.

Q5. Why does ISO 20022 dominate regulatory conversations?

Because it's far more than just a messaging upgrade—it completely changes how payments move. The richer data it provides is fantastic for improving fraud detection and sanctions screening, but it puts a serious strain on banks still using older systems. The ECB has set a 2025 deadline, the Fed has tied its FedNow service to ISO compliance, and SWIFT is phasing out its old messages. Early adopters are already testing their migrations, while those who wait face vendor backlogs and major IT headaches. As one compliance head put it: “If we miss this, we’re cut off.”

Q6. What metadata should accompany every regulatory update?

At a minimum, every update needs to be tagged with: jurisdiction, regulator, impacted payment system, effective date, risk level, team ownership, and whether an action is required. More advanced setups will also cross-reference related rules, note any previous actions, and log consultation periods. Having well-tagged metadata can save countless hours of manual sorting and dramatically reduce the number of missed deadlines.

Q7. What is “time-to-comply,” and why does it matter?

"Time-to-comply" is the window you have between when a rule is published and when it goes into effect. Sometimes that window is generous, but often it isn’t. For sanctions, you might only get 24 hours. For AML rules, it could be a few months. Even for big infrastructure projects like ISO 20022, the timeline looks long on paper, but vendors and internal teams eat up most of that time. Short timelines are a true test of a company's agility. Without automated dashboards and alerts, you might not even realize the clock has already started.

Q8. How should institutions manage overlapping regulations across regions?

The key is to spot the overlaps early. For example, the UK's rules on Faster Payments System (FPS) fraud are very similar to the EU’s SEPA requirements. Similarly, U.S. BSA rules align closely with Canada’s FINTRAC. By cross-referencing these rules, firms can create a single, unified framework that satisfies the toughest rule set first, and then handle any minor differences separately. This approach significantly reduces duplicated effort and saves money.

Q9. Why do teams push for plain-language summaries?

Because regulatory documents can easily run 40 or 50 pages of dense, technical text. While legal teams can parse them, operations, tech, and executives need something much faster to act on. A clear, two-sentence summary with a checklist and a simple timeline graphic can cut through the noise. Firms that use this method see fewer communication breakdowns and can respond to changes much more quickly.

Q10. How do sanctions updates fit into regulatory intelligence?

Sanctions represent the fastest-moving regulatory risk. Updates can come daily, often requiring action within just a few hours. Manual processes simply can't keep up; you need automated screening, constant corridor analysis, and clear communication protocols. Without automation, you’ll end up with a pile of false positives and the high risk of a violation slipping through.

Q11. Why monitor consultation papers?

Consultation papers are a window into the future. What regulators propose today often becomes a binding rule in 12 to 18 months. Firms that proactively track these consultations can start planning budgets, preparing their systems, and even providing feedback that could influence the final rules. Studies show that over 80% of proposals in consultation papers eventually make it into the final regulations.

Q12. What’s the value of trend tagging?

Tagging updates by topic—like fraud, consumer protection, or resilience—helps you spot larger patterns. For instance, in 2024, regulators worldwide started linking instant payments with new fraud requirements. Firms that were watching those tags had months of extra time to prepare their systems. Trend spotting turns your reactive alerts into predictive insights.

Q13. How do publication inconsistencies affect automation?

They make it incredibly messy. Some regulators use clean, structured feeds, others post in messy HTML, and far too many still just upload PDFs. To handle this, automation has to be able to juggle complex parsing, natural language processing (NLP), template recognition, and cross-checking. Without this kind of advanced automation, compliance officers are stuck wasting hours on manual copy-pasting instead of focusing on managing real risk.

Q14. What’s an operational resilience rule to watch?

he EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is the key framework to watch. It sets a new standard by demanding extensive resilience testing, strict vendor oversight, and 24-hour incident reporting. Countries like Singapore, Australia, and Canada are all rolling out similar frameworks. The deadlines are tight, with EU institutions needing to be fully compliant by 2025.

Q15. Why is global visibility so important?

Executives don’t want to see dozens of separate, local reports. They need to know if risks are clustering in a specific area, like AML, consumer protection, or payments. Dashboards that use heat maps, timelines, and thematic analysis provide that big-picture view. This kind of global visibility allows leaders to allocate resources more strategically and respond to risks more effectively.

Q16. How should firms rate the impact of updates?

Start with a simple High/Medium/Low rating, but always add context. For example:

High: A SEPA Instant change affecting 19 countries, with only a 45-day window to comply.
Medium: A rule change impacting only the UK-EU corridor, with 120 days to prepare.

Context is what helps teams understand how to prioritize their time and effort.

Q17. How do cross-border rules differ from domestic ones?

Cross-border rules are significantly more complex. You’re dealing with multiple regulators, stricter anti-money laundering (AML) requirements, and geopolitical pressures. The timelines are often shorter, and the rules themselves can even conflict. The best practice is to adopt the toughest standard across all regions first, and then adapt it locally where needed.

Q18. Why do institutions miss deadlines?

It's rarely due to laziness. More often, it’s because an important update slips through the cracks, ownership isn't clearly assigned, or teams are simply stretched too thin. Centralized intake, automated assignments, and early alerts can dramatically boost compliance rates—with some studies showing a jump from 73% to as high as 96%.

Q19. Why track enforcement cases?

Because they show what regulators truly care about. The official guidance might say one thing, but the penalties and fines tell the real story. In 2024, fines for sanctions violations jumped significantly, averaging over $12 million. Consumer protection cases also rose, often tied to hidden fees. Watching enforcement actions helps firms prioritize where to invest their time and money.

Q20. What’s the difference between monitoring and intelligence?

Monitoring is just collecting data; intelligence is connecting it. Monitoring tells you, "Here are 47 new updates." Intelligence translates that into a clear narrative: "Three of these require immediate action, 12 need to be planned for, and the rest are just noise—but keep an eye on anything related to digital assets." This shift from noise to narrative is what makes compliance truly effective.

Q21. What regulatory risk gets overlooked?

Consumer protection. Anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions rules tend to grab all the attention, but regulators are quietly tightening rules around fees and disclosures. While the fines might be smaller, the reputational damage is often worse. Customers will talk more about being hit with a hidden fee than they will about a bank's sanctions filter.

Q22. How should institutions assign ownership?

Every single update needs a single, accountable team—whether that’s compliance, operations, technology, or legal. Shared ownership often means no one is truly responsible. The best results happen when one leader ties everything together and has the authority to escalate issues when necessary.

Q23. What do regulators expect in resilience testing?

Regulators expect more than just paperwork. They want to see how your firm would actually respond in a real crisis—like a ransomware attack, a major vendor outage, or a payment system disruption. Quarterly tests are becoming common, and regulators sometimes even observe these exercises. What truly matters is whether your systems, your people, and your communications all hold up under pressure.

Q24. How are regulators reacting to instant payments?

Regulators are both excited and nervous. The idea of money moving in seconds is great for customers, but it also means fraud can happen just as quickly. Because of this, regulators are pumping the brakes. In Europe, they've actually written fraud controls directly into the law. And in the U.S., FedNow won't even let a bank join its system without proof that its security measures are solid. It's the same story in the UK, where they’ve been making the rules around their Faster Payments system even stricter. The message is pretty clear: enjoy the speed, but don't forget the brakes.

Q25. Why is automation essential?

Frankly, there’s just too much to keep up with. A big global bank might see dozens of regulatory notices in a single day, often in different formats or even languages that their staff can’t read. No human team, no matter how good, can manage that manually. Automation is essential because it handles all the tedious work—like collecting, translating, and filtering information—so people can focus on what actually matters. Without it, you’d be spending hours just copying data from PDFs, while real risks could be slipping right past you.

Q26. How can firms anticipate draft rules?

By paying close attention to early signals. Consultation papers, regulator speeches, pilot programs, and industry forums often point the way. If you see multiple countries piloting the same idea, you can assume it's going to become law in the future. Firms that prepare early save money and avoid last-minute scrambles.

Q27. What do sanctions updates demand in practice?

Speed and coordination. You don’t get weeks—you might get hours. A typical workflow would involve: an initial assessment in the first couple of hours, a legal review soon after, system updates by midday, and customer communications before the end of the day. If you can't keep up that pace, you risk blocking legitimate payments or, even worse, processing payments for a sanctioned entity.

Q28. Why monitor payment infrastructure changes?

Because when the foundation of the payments system shifts, it affects everything connected to it. If the settlement cycle changes, suddenly a bank's entire plan for managing cash flow needs to be rethought. If a new messaging standard is introduced, fraud filters might stop working properly. When FedNow was launched, for example, banks had to update their technology, their reporting, and even the messages they sent to customers. These changes almost never stay contained; they tend to spill into every part of a company’s operations.

Q29. How do firms avoid missing obscure updates?

By knowing where to look. Not all major changes are announced in a big press release from a central bank. Sometimes the first sign is buried in a vendor’s notice or an obscure trade association email. The most successful firms bring all of these different sources of information together into one central view. This way, nothing slips through the cracks. It's often that one quiet, easily missed update that no one spots at first that ends up causing the biggest problems later on.

Q30. How does Carver Intelligence fit into this picture?

Carver takes dozens of disconnected alerts and turns them into a coherent story. Instead of getting "50 notices," you get a clear narrative: "Three of these matter now, ten need monitoring, and the rest are just noise." This shift helps compliance teams move from constant firefighting to strategic planning, which lowers stress and saves money while keeping firms ahead of regulators.

Q1. What is Carver RegWatch in one sentence?

Carver RegWatch is AI-powered regulatory risk intelligence for financial services that monitors 500+ local and global regulatory sources and delivers personalized, real-time strategic alerts and easy-to-consume reports with predictive analysis - deployed in two weeks at a fraction of traditional enterprise intelligence costs.

Q2. RegWatch at a glance:

What it is: AI-powered regulatory horizon scanning and risk intelligence platform
Who it's for: Risk managers, strategy leaders, legal teams, and executives at financial services firms (like fintechs, payment processors, lenders, crypto, and asset managers)
Coverage: 500+ regulatory bodies across major financial services jurisdictions globally
Setup time: Two weeks from onboarding to live intelligence feeds
Deployment: Web platform + Slack/email alerts + API integration
Pricing model: Outcome-based (scales with your needs, not rigid enterprise contracts)

Key differentiator: Strategic risk intelligence, not compliance monitoring - focused on competitive advantage and market timing.

Q3. Is RegWatch right for me?

RegWatch is the right fit if you:

Need to anticipate regulatory changes before they impact your business
Want to identify market opportunities created by regulatory shifts
Operate in multiple jurisdictions or plan to expand
Are tired of manually monitoring dozens of regulator websites
Need intelligence that informs strategy, not just compliance
Want enterprise-grade monitoring without enterprise complexity or cost

RegWatch may NOT be the right fit if you:

Only need compliance task management (you want a GRC workflow tool)
Need legal advice or regulatory consulting (we provide intelligence, not advisory)
Only operate in one stable jurisdiction with minimal regulatory change
Have a dedicated 10+ person team manually monitoring and are satisfied with that approach

Q1. What is Carver RegWatch?

Carver RegWatch is a regulatory risk intelligence platform that helps financial services leaders turn regulatory uncertainty into strategic advantage. We deliver AI-powered horizon scanning that lets you anticipate regulatory shifts before they happen, identify market opportunities early, and make faster strategic decisions than competitors. Think of it as mid-market LexisNexis - enterprise-grade risk intelligence without the enterprise complexity or cost.

Q2. How does RegWatch create strategic advantage?

By giving you visibility into regulatory changes 3-6 months before they take effect. You see consultation papers when comment periods open, catch early enforcement trend shifts, spot regulatory infrastructure changes that signal market opportunities. This timing advantage means: launching products ahead of competitors, entering markets at the right regulatory moment, adjusting strategy before others see the shift, and shaping regulatory outcomes through early engagement in comment periods.

Q3. How is regulatory risk intelligence different from compliance monitoring?

Compliance monitoring is backward-looking - "are we meeting the rules?" Risk intelligence is forward-looking - "how will this change our market?" Compliance tools tell you about deadlines and requirements after rules are published. RegWatch tells you what's coming before it's finalized, analyzes strategic implications, and helps you position your business advantageously. You're not just avoiding penalties - you're gaining a competitive edge.

Q4. Can RegWatch predict future regulatory changes?

Yes. Beyond monitoring what's already published, RegWatch analyzes patterns in consultation papers, enforcement trends, legislative signals, and regulator behavior to give you early warning signs of where regulation is heading. This predictive capability is critical for strategy teams planning product launches, market expansion, or partnership decisions - you see regulatory shifts before they become rules, giving you months to position strategically.

Q5. How do I access RegWatch? Is it a web app, mobile app, or desktop software?

RegWatch is a web-based platform accessible from any browser. We also deliver intelligence directly to where you work - Slack channels, email inboxes, or via API into your GRC platform or internal tools. We offer a Chrome extension for quick access to regulatory documents and context while browsing. Mobile access works through the web interface (responsive design), and we're developing native mobile apps based on customer demand.

Q6. What is the RegWatch Chrome extension?

The Chrome extension lets you access RegWatch intelligence while browsing regulatory websites. Highlight regulatory text to get instant AI analysis, save documents to your RegWatch feed with one click, and see if RegWatch has already analyzed a regulatory update you're reading. It's designed for teams who spend time directly on regulator websites and want seamless integration with their existing workflows.

Q7. What does "AI-powered analysis" actually mean? What technology do you use?

Our AI pipeline combines multiple techniques: large language models (LLMs) for summarization and impact analysis, machine learning for relevance scoring based on your business profile, natural language processing for entity extraction and classification, and predictive models for trend analysis. We use a combination of proprietary fine-tuned models and leading foundation models. The system learns from your feedback - what you mark as relevant or irrelevant continuously improves your feed's accuracy.

Q8. What RegWatch is NOT:

RegWatch is not a GRC workflow tool (we don't manage compliance tasks, policies, or internal controls - we feed intelligence into those systems)
RegWatch is not legal advice or regulatory consulting (we provide intelligence; you need lawyers for interpretation)
RegWatch is not a replacement for your compliance team (we make them more effective by automating monitoring)
RegWatch is not a document management system (we analyze and alert; we don't store your internal compliance docs)
RegWatch is not guaranteed to catch 100% of everything (we monitor 500+ sources and continuously expand, but regulatory publishing is decentralized - we're transparent about coverage)

Q9. Can we customize the AI analysis for our specific use cases?

Yes, within reason. During onboarding, we configure the relevance scoring based on your business profile, and the system learns from your usage patterns. For enterprise customers with unique analytical needs, we can develop custom analysis modules - for example, specific impact frameworks for crypto custody, specialized AML pattern recognition, or custom regulatory relationship mapping. This typically requires additional scoping and may involve professional services fees.

Q10. How fresh is the regulatory data? How quickly do we get alerts?

Our system scans regulatory sources continuously (every few minutes for high-priority sources, hourly for others). When a new update appears, our AI analyzes it and, if relevant to your profile, you typically receive an alert within 5-15 minutes of publication. For major regulatory announcements from priority sources (SEC, FINRA, FCA, etc.), alerts are often delivered within 2-3 minutes. We're transparent about scanning frequency for each source in your dashboard.

Q1. How is RegWatch different from traditional regulatory intelligence services like LexisNexis or Bloomberg Regulatory Intelligence?

Traditional services are powerful but built for large legal departments with 6-12 month implementations and rigid enterprise pricing (often $50K-$150K+ annually). RegWatch gives you the strategic intelligence - continuous horizon scanning with predictive analysis - without the complexity or cost. You're live in two weeks, not six months. And critically, we're built for business decision-makers, not just legal teams. The intelligence you get is framed around business impact, not legal interpretation. We're the mid-market solution with enterprise capabilities.

Q2. How does RegWatch compare to Compliance.ai?

Compliance.ai focuses on regulatory change management and policy-to-procedure workflows - it's more of a GRC/compliance operations tool. RegWatch focuses on upstream intelligence and strategic risk visibility - we're about anticipating change and informing strategy before you need to update policies. Organizations can use both: RegWatch for intelligence gathering and strategic planning, Compliance.ai for managing the downstream compliance response and policy updates.

Q3. RegWatch vs Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence?

Thomson Reuters offers comprehensive legal research and regulatory content, excellent for deep legal analysis and historical regulatory research. RegWatch is purpose-built for real-time forward-looking intelligence - we're optimized for "what's changing and what does it mean for my business strategy?" not "what's the complete legal framework on topic X?" RegWatch is faster to implement, more affordable for mid-market companies, and better suited for strategic risk management vs. legal research.

Q4. We already have a GRC system (Archer, ServiceNow, MetricStream, etc.). Do we need RegWatch?

Yes - GRC systems manage compliance workflows, policies, controls, and risk assessments. They're execution tools. RegWatch is your intelligence layer - it feeds those systems with the regulatory changes that trigger workflow updates. Think of it this way: your GRC system asks "are we compliant?" RegWatch answers "what's changing that we need to respond to?" We recommend that customers integrate RegWatch with their GRC platform via API, so intelligence automatically flows into their existing workflows.

Q5. Can't we just use Google Alerts, RSS feeds, or free regulatory newsletters?

You can try, but you'll face three problems: (1) Volume - you'll get thousands of irrelevant alerts or miss critical ones buried in noise; (2) No analysis - raw regulatory text without business context or impact assessment; (3) No predictive intelligence - you only see final rules, not early signals from consultations or enforcement trends. RegWatch filters noise, provides analysis, and gives you forward-looking intelligence. The time your team saves (10-15 hours/week typically) usually pays for RegWatch several times over.

Q6. Our law firm sends us regulatory updates. Why do we need RegWatch?

Law firms provide valuable legal interpretation and advisory services. But their alerts tend to be: (1) Often delayed - they summarize after publication, you need real-time; (2) Generic - sent to all clients, not personalized to your business; (3) Incomplete - they cover major developments, but you need comprehensive monitoring; (4) Not predictive - they react to final rules, not early consultation signals. Our customers use RegWatch for comprehensive monitoring and early warning, then engage their law firm for legal interpretation on the most critical developments.

Q7. We're already paying for [Bloomberg Terminal/Refinitiv/Factset]. Don't they cover regulatory intelligence?

Those platforms focus on market data, financial news, and research. They include regulatory content, but it's not their core strength. RegWatch is purpose-built for regulatory risk intelligence - deeper coverage of regulatory sources, AI-powered relevance filtering for your specific business, predictive analysis, and integration designed for risk management workflows. If you're using those platforms for market intelligence, you likely still need specialized regulatory intelligence like RegWatch.

Q8. How is this different from hiring someone to manually monitor regulations?

Manual monitoring has three fatal flaws: (1) It doesn't scale - one person can't comprehensively monitor 500+ sources; (2) It's inconsistent - people miss things, take vacations, leave companies; (3) It's slow - by the time someone reads, analyzes, and writes summaries, strategic windows close. RegWatch monitors 24/7, never misses sources, delivers analysis in minutes, and costs less than one FTE while covering exponentially more ground. Our customers redeploy their manual monitoring staff to higher-value strategic analysis using RegWatch intelligence.

Q1. 1. What does the two-week onboarding involve?

Week 1: We work with you to map your strategic priorities - products, markets, growth plans, partnership strategy. We configure intelligence feeds that support your decision-making, not just your regulatory obligations. We set up your team's access, configure delivery channels (Slack, email), and customize relevance filters.

Week 2: You validate the intelligence quality, provide feedback to refine filters, and we train your teams on extracting strategic insights. If you need API integration for your GRC tools or data pipelines, that happens in parallel. Most customers are getting strategic value by day 10.

Q2. Do we need IT involvement to implement RegWatch?

Not for basic deployment - business stakeholders configure the intelligence feeds based on strategic priorities. If you want API integration with your tech stack or custom data pipelines for analytics, you'll involve IT, but the core platform works out-of-the-box. Implementation is measured in days, not months - because strategic advantage depends on speed. For enterprise customers with complex integration requirements, we can provide technical project management support.

Q3. How does RegWatch integrate with our existing tools?

We deliver intelligence where you work - Slack channels, email inboxes, or directly into your GRC platform via API. We have pre-built integrations with common GRC tools (Archer, ServiceNow, MetricStream, LogicGate), and if you're using something we don't natively support, our RESTful API makes custom integration straightforward. We're MCP-native, so if you're building agentic workflows or advanced analytics, RegWatch integrates seamlessly. Think of us as an intelligence layer that feeds your entire decision-making infrastructure.

Q4. What API capabilities does RegWatch provide?

Our RESTful API provides: real-time alert webhooks (push intelligence to your systems immediately), query endpoints (search historical regulatory updates), entity endpoints (retrieve regulator profiles, jurisdictional coverage), relevance scoring endpoints (get AI analysis on demand), and export endpoints (bulk download in JSON, CSV formats). Rate limits scale with your subscription tier. Full API documentation available during onboarding, with example code in Python, JavaScript, and cURL. We support both polling and webhook models depending on your architecture.

Q5. Which GRC platforms do you integrate with?

We have tested integrations with: RSA Archer, ServiceNow GRC, MetricStream, LogicGate, OneTrust, Quantivate, NAVEX Global, and AuditBoard. Integration typically means RegWatch alerts automatically create records, trigger workflows, or appear in your risk register. If your GRC platform has an API, we can integrate - usually takes 1-2 weeks for custom connectors. If you're not sure about your specific platform, ask us during the sales process.

Q6. Can we integrate RegWatch with our internal Slack or Microsoft Teams?

Yes - this is one of our most popular deployment modes. RegWatch can post intelligence alerts directly to Slack channels or Teams channels, organized by topic, jurisdiction, or urgency. Your teams get real-time notifications without leaving their collaboration tools. You can configure which alerts go to which channels (e.g., AML updates to #compliance, crypto regulations to #strategy). We also support Slack workflows and Teams cards with interactive elements for quick triage.

Q7. What data formats can we export?

Intelligence and alerts can be exported in: JSON (for data pipelines), CSV (for spreadsheet analysis), PDF (for reports and documentation), XML (for legacy system integration), and Markdown (for documentation tools). You can schedule automated exports daily/weekly or export on demand. Historical data exports include full regulatory text, AI analysis, relevance scores, and metadata. This flexibility ensures RegWatch fits into whatever workflows you've already built.

Q8. Do you support webhooks for real-time integration?

Yes. Webhooks are the preferred integration method for real-time use cases. Configure webhook endpoints in your RegWatch dashboard, and we'll push alerts to your systems immediately when new intelligence is available. You can filter webhooks by relevance score, jurisdiction, topic, or regulatory body - so you only get real-time notifications for what matters most. Webhooks include full payload (regulatory text, analysis, metadata) in JSON format. Retry logic and delivery confirmation included.

Q9. How long does API integration typically take?

For standard integrations (Slack, email, pre-built GRC connectors): 1-3 days. For custom API integration into your internal systems: 1-2 weeks depending on complexity. For enterprise customers with complex requirements (multiple systems, custom data transformations, legacy infrastructure): 4-6 weeks. We provide technical support and sample code to accelerate integration. Most delays are on the customer side (IT bandwidth, approval processes) rather than technical complexity.

Q1. What regulatory bodies and jurisdictions do you cover?

We monitor 500+ regulatory bodies across financial services globally, including: US (SEC, FINRA, CFPB, FinCEN, OCC, FDIC, Federal Reserve, state regulators), UK (FCA, PRA, PSR), EU (EBA, ESMA, ECB, national regulators), Asia-Pacific (MAS, HKMA, ASIC, JFSA), Canada (OSFI, provincial regulators), and many others. Coverage includes banking, payments, securities, lending, crypto/digital assets, AML/CFT, consumer protection, sanctions, and cross-border frameworks like FATF. We auto-discover new sources as they become strategically relevant to financial services.

Q2. What exactly do you monitor beyond regulatory agencies?

RegWatch tracks the full regulatory ecosystem: federal, state, and local regulators; court decisions that set precedent; legislative developments; enforcement actions and examination priorities; regulatory guidance and policy statements; consultation papers and comment periods; third-party vendor and partner risk signals; geopolitical developments affecting financial services regulation; industry standards bodies (ISO, SWIFT); and international frameworks (FATF, Basel Committee). You see the complete picture - not just final rules.

Q3. Do you cover every regulatory body globally?

No platform covers 100% of global regulatory bodies - there are thousands, many publishing only in local languages or informal channels. RegWatch covers 500+ sources across major financial services markets, which represents >95% of regulatory activity that matters to international financial services firms. We're transparent about coverage gaps. If there's a specific regulator critical to your market strategy that we don't cover, tell us - we evaluate coverage expansion requests quarterly and often add niche sources for enterprise customers.

Q4. What happens if a jurisdiction or regulator I need isn't covered?

First, we'll tell you during the sales process - we're upfront about coverage. Second, if it's a gap affecting multiple customers or clearly important to financial services, we'll prioritize adding it to our standard coverage. Third, for enterprise customers, we offer custom monitoring as a professional services add-on - we'll build dedicated coverage for specific niche sources. Fourth, you can supplement RegWatch with manual monitoring for edge cases while still automating 90%+ of your monitoring workload.

Q5. How do I know which sources you're monitoring for my business?

Complete transparency: your RegWatch dashboard shows the full list of regulatory bodies we're tracking for your business, organized by jurisdiction and topic. You can see when each source was last scanned, update frequency, and historical alert volume. You can add or remove sources based on your strategic priorities. If you're unsure whether a specific regulator is covered, search our coverage directory or ask your account manager.

Q6. Do you track enforcement actions and examination priorities?

Yes - this is critical for risk intelligence. Understanding how regulators are actually examining and enforcing rules tells you where regulatory focus is shifting before formal guidance updates. Our enforcement digests cover: monetary penalties, consent orders, supervisory actions, examination findings (when public), enforcement trends by topic and institution type, and examination priority memos. This forward-looking enforcement intelligence helps you anticipate where regulators are headed next, so you can position your risk posture ahead of peers.

Q7. Why does third-party and partner monitoring matter for strategic decisions?

When you're evaluating partnerships, acquisitions, or vendor relationships, their regulatory risk becomes your risk. RegWatch tracks regulatory developments affecting your partners and vendors - enforcement actions, license changes, regulatory complaints, examination issues - giving you early warning of problems that could impact your business. This intelligence is critical for BD teams, strategic partnerships, M&A due diligence, and vendor risk management. (Note: for dedicated third-party entity monitoring, ask us about PartnerWatch.)

Q8. Do you monitor international organizations like FATF, Basel Committee, FSB?

Yes. International standard-setting bodies often drive regulatory change before national regulators implement it. We monitor FATF (Financial Action Task Force), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Financial Stability Board, IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions), IAIS (International Association of Insurance Supervisors), and regional bodies. This gives you months of advance warning before international standards become national regulations.

Q9. How do you handle non-English regulatory sources?

For major non-English markets (EU member states, Japan, China, Latin America), we use AI translation and analysis to deliver intelligence in English. Translation quality varies - we flag machine-translated content and always link to original source documents so you can validate. For critical markets where accuracy is paramount, we partner with regional legal experts for human review of key documents. If you operate in non-English markets and need high-confidence translation, discuss with us during onboarding.

Q1. Who should use RegWatch?

RegWatch is built for risk managers, strategy leaders, legal teams, and executives at financial services companies (e.g., banks, credit unions, fintechs, payment processors, lending platforms, crypto firms, asset managers, and insurtech). If you're responsible for strategic risk management, competitive positioning, or navigating regulatory change to capture market opportunity, RegWatch is for you. We're designed for SMBs (5-500 employees) who need enterprise intelligence without enterprise overhead, though we also serve larger organizations.

Q2. I'm a strategy leader, not a risk person. Is this still relevant?

Absolutely - strategy leaders are actually our core users. You use RegWatch to identify regulatory shifts that create market opportunities or affect competitive positioning. Examples: early signals about open banking rule changes that enable new products, BNPL regulatory clarity that opens markets, crypto licensing requirements that create moats, cross-border payment infrastructure modernization that affects your expansion plans. These are strategic intelligence signals, not just risk management. RegWatch helps you time market entry, shape product roadmaps, and identify white space opportunities.

Q3. What does a risk manager use RegWatch for strategically?

Modern risk managers aren't just managing downside - they're enabling business velocity by providing forward-looking intelligence. Daily use includes: identifying emerging risk trends before they hit the organization, advising strategy teams on regulatory timing for product launches, tracking third-party vendor regulatory posture for partnership decisions, building early warning systems for market-level regulatory shifts, providing executive leadership with actionable risk intelligence for strategic planning, and contributing to board discussions about regulatory landscape changes.

Q4. How do legal teams use this differently than compliance teams?

Legal teams use RegWatch for strategic advisory - understanding regulatory direction to advise on market entry, product development, partnership structures, and regulatory engagement strategy. It's about being a business enabler, not a gatekeeper. When strategy teams ask "can we do this?" legal teams use RegWatch intelligence to say "here's the regulatory landscape, here's what's coming, here's how to position for success." Compliance teams use RegWatch more for monitoring obligations and preparing compliance responses, but both functions benefit from the same underlying intelligence.

Q.5 Can executives use this for board-level strategic planning?

Yes. Executives use RegWatch to prepare board materials on regulatory landscape shifts, competitive positioning, and strategic risk outlook. The intelligence helps answer questions like: Where is regulation heading in our core markets? What regulatory changes create opportunities? Where should we invest for 3-year regulatory positioning? What risks should inform our strategic planning? RegWatch provides the external intelligence that contextualizes internal risk reporting for board discussions.

Q6. What types of companies use RegWatch?

The potential customer base spans: (1) Fintechs - neobanks, lending platforms, payment processors, personal finance apps, embedded finance providers, crypto exchanges, digital assets/trading; (2) Traditional financial institutions - community banks, credit unions, regional banks, asset managers, broker-dealers; (3) Financial infrastructure - core banking providers, BaaS platforms, payment infrastructure, compliance tech vendors; (4) Adjacent sectors - insurtech, proptech with financial services exposure, marketplace platforms with financial components. If you touch financial services regulation, RegWatch likely fits.

Q7. We're pre-revenue. Is it too early for RegWatch?

Depends on your regulatory exposure. If you're building in a heavily regulated space (banking, payments, lending, crypto), regulatory intelligence should be part of your product development process - not something you add after launch. Pre-revenue companies use RegWatch during product design to ensure they're building for the regulatory landscape that will exist when they go to market, not the one that exists today. Early-stage pricing is available for pre-Series A companies. If you're pre-product or in a pure R&D phase, it might be early - but talk to us.

Q8. What size teams does RegWatch serve?

The sweet spot is 1-200 employees, though we focus on companies from 1 to 500+. Small teams (1-25) use RegWatch to punch above their weight - getting enterprise intelligence without enterprise staff. Medium teams (25-100) use RegWatch to scale their risk function without proportional headcount increases. Larger teams (100-500) use RegWatch to consolidate fragmented monitoring and ensure consistency across regions/business units. Different sizes use the same platform differently, but all gain the core benefit: comprehensive automated regulatory risk intelligence instead of manual monitoring.

Q9. What regulatory maturity level do we need to benefit from RegWatch?

You don't need mature compliance infrastructure to benefit - in fact, earlier-stage companies often get more value because RegWatch provides the intelligence foundation they haven't built yet. If you have: (1) regulatory obligations (or plan to), (2) decision-makers who care about regulatory risk, and (3) limited time/resources for manual monitoring, you'll benefit. RegWatch works for companies just getting licensed, companies scaling across jurisdictions, and mature companies optimizing their intelligence capabilities. We adjust onboarding to your maturity level.

Q1. What support do you offer? What are your support hours?

Every customer gets: (1) Dedicated account manager (understands your business and intelligence needs); (2) Email support during US business hours (9am-6pm ET, Monday-Friday); (3) Slack channel support for faster response; (4) Quarterly strategic reviews to optimize your intelligence feeds. Response time SLAs: routine questions within 4 hours, urgent issues within 1 hour during business hours. Enterprise customers can add premium SLA support (24/7 coverage, 30-minute response times, dedicated technical support) for an additional fee.

Q2. What happens if we miss a critical alert due to a RegWatch system issue?

First, this is extremely rare - our uptime is 99.9%+ and we have redundant monitoring systems. Second, we're transparent: if a system issue causes missed coverage, we notify you immediately and provide retroactive analysis. Third, and critically - RegWatch is an intelligence tool, not a regulatory compliance guarantee. Your organization remains responsible for regulatory obligations; we're here to support, not replace, your compliance function.

Q3. Do you offer 24/7 support?

Standard subscriptions include business hours support. Enterprise customers can purchase premium 24/7 support for critical use cases - regulatory emergencies, system issues during off-hours, global operations across time zones. Most customers find business hours support sufficient because regulatory publishing happens during business hours and RegWatch's automated monitoring doesn't need human intervention to function 24/7. If your use case requires always-on support, we can accommodate that.

Q4. What training resources are available?

Included with every subscription: (1) Live onboarding training (2-4 hours with your team); (2) Recorded training library (video tutorials for all platform features); (3) Written documentation (user guides, best practices, FAQ); For enterprise customers: custom training workshops, train-the-trainer programs, and executive briefings on maximizing intelligence value.

Q5. How much time per week do users spend in RegWatch?

Varies by role: (1) Risk managers: 30-60 min/day reviewing alerts and doing deep-dive analysis on relevant developments; (2) Strategy leaders: 10-20 min/day scanning alerts, deeper dives when strategic questions arise; (3) Legal teams: 20-40 min/day depending on regulatory volume in their jurisdictions; (4) Executives: 5-10 min/day scanning summaries, executive briefings, occasional deep dives. The platform is designed for efficient triage - most users spend far less time in RegWatch than they previously spent manually monitoring sources.

Q6. What's the learning curve for new users?

Most users are productive within 1-2 days. Basic functions (reading alerts, marking relevant/not relevant, sharing with team) are intuitive. Advanced features (custom searches, building watchlists, API integration, complex filtering) take 1-2 weeks to master. We provide role-based onboarding - risk managers get different training than strategy leaders. Power users typically emerge within the first month who become internal champions and train other team members.

Q7. How do we roll out RegWatch across our organization?

We recommend phased rollout: (1) Week 1-2: Pilot with core risk/compliance team (3-5 users) to validate intelligence quality; (2) Week 3-4: Expand to legal/strategy team and key business leaders; (3) Month 2: Add regional teams or business unit leads; (4) Month 3: Open to broader team based on roles. We provide communication guidance, and success metrics to track adoption. Forcing too-fast adoption typically fails - let early wins drive organic adoption.

Q8. What's the typical user adoption timeline?

Month 1: Learning and validation - users compare RegWatch to their existing processes, identify where it adds value. ‍

Month 2-3: Integration - RegWatch becomes part of daily workflows, users stop checking sources manually.

Month 4-6: Dependency - teams rely on RegWatch as primary intelligence source, expand use cases.

Month 6-12: Optimization - teams develop sophisticated filtering, custom workflows, and strategic applications beyond initial use case. Full adoption typically takes 2-4 months depending on organization size and change management.

Q9. Can we add users after initial setup?

Yes - pricing typically allows for reasonable user growth within your subscription tier. Major increases (e.g., doubling your user count) may trigger repricing, but we're flexible. Adding users administratively takes minutes. We recommend gradual expansion rather than giving access to everyone immediately; thoughtful user selection leads to better adoption and more valuable usage patterns.

Q1. How secure is RegWatch?

We're built with enterprise-grade security: SOC 2 Type II certified, encrypted data transmission (TLS 1.3), encrypted data at rest (AES-256), role-based access controls, multi-factor authentication, secure API authentication (OAuth 2.0 + API keys), regular penetration testing, and vulnerability scanning. We treat your intelligence configuration as sensitive strategic information. Full audit trails track all intelligence delivered and actions taken within the platform. Our security posture is designed to meet financial services regulatory expectations.

Q2. What data does RegWatch store about our business?

We store: (1) Your monitoring preferences - jurisdictions, products, strategic priorities, alert configurations; (2) User account information - names, emails, roles, access permissions; (3) Usage data - what alerts you view, mark relevant, share, or export; (4) Feedback data - your relevance ratings that improve AI accuracy. We do NOT store: your customer data, transaction data, proprietary business information, internal compliance documentation, or sensitive business strategy beyond what's needed for relevance filtering. RegWatch monitors public regulatory sources only.

Q3. Where is our data physically stored? What about data residency?

Primary infrastructure hosted on AWS (US-based data centers) with redundancy across multiple availability zones. For customers with data residency requirements (EU, UK, Canada, Australia), we offer regional deployment options with data stored in-country. Regulatory intelligence content itself is public data, but your configuration and usage data can be geo-located per your requirements. Discuss data residency needs during the sales process - setup may require additional time and cost.

Q4. Are you GDPR/CCPA compliant?

Yes. We comply with GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), and similar privacy regulations. We maintain data processing agreements (DPA) with customers, honor data subject access requests, provide data portability, support right to erasure, and limit data collection to what's necessary for service delivery. We don't sell customer data to third parties. Full privacy policy available on our website, and we can provide DPA during contracting process.

Q5. How long do you retain our data? Can we request deletion?

Active subscription: We retain your configuration, usage history, and delivered intelligence indefinitely (or per your retention policy if specified). Post-cancellation: We retain data for 90 days to support potential re-activation, then delete unless you request longer retention for audit purposes. You can request deletion anytime - we'll delete your account data within 30 days (some data may be retained in backups for 90 days per our data retention policy). Regulatory intelligence content (public data) is retained in our general database even after you leave.

Q6. Do you sell or share customer data with third parties?

No. We don't sell customer data. We don't share customer data with third parties except: (1) Service providers who help us deliver RegWatch (cloud hosting, email delivery, analytics tools - all under strict DPAs); (2) As required by law (subpoenas, regulatory requests); (3) Aggregated anonymized data for product improvement (no customer-identifiable information). Your monitoring configuration and usage patterns are confidential - we never share what you're monitoring or how you use RegWatch with competitors or other customers.

Q7. Is RegWatch's intelligence considered legal advice?

No. RegWatch provides regulatory intelligence - factual analysis of regulatory developments and their potential business implications. We do not provide legal advice, legal interpretation, or recommendations on specific compliance actions. You should consult qualified legal counsel for legal advice. Our AI analysis includes disclaimers that it's for informational purposes only. RegWatch is a tool to help your legal and compliance teams work more effectively; it doesn't replace their professional judgment.

Q8. What happens if RegWatch misses a critical regulatory change?

First, we maintain 99.9%+ uptime and monitor 500+ sources continuously - missed coverage is rare. Second, our service agreement is clear: we provide commercially reasonable efforts to deliver comprehensive intelligence, but don't guarantee 100% coverage of every regulatory development globally. Third, your organization remains responsible for regulatory compliance - RegWatch is a support tool, not a compliance guarantee. Fourth, if you identify a missed update, report it to us immediately; we'll analyze the root cause and improve coverage. We're partners in your risk management, not liability absorbers.

Q9. What are your liability limits and terms?

Our service agreement includes standard SaaS liability provisions. We're not liable for indirect, consequential, or punitive damages (e.g., fines from regulators, lost business opportunities). This is industry-standard for B2B SaaS. Full terms available during contracting. If you have specific liability requirements (common for large banks), we can discuss them during negotiation.

Q10. Does RegWatch replace the need for compliance counsel or consultants?

No. RegWatch is an intelligence tool that makes your legal, compliance, and consulting teams more effective. It automates the monitoring and initial analysis, freeing your professionals to focus on interpretation, strategy, and advice. Our customers use RegWatch alongside external law firms - RegWatch does the comprehensive monitoring, law firms provide legal interpretation and strategic counsel. Think of RegWatch as the data layer; you still need human expertise for decision-making.

Q11. Can we get RegWatch's security documentation for our vendor review process?

Yes. We provide: SOC 2 Type II report, security questionnaire responses, penetration test summaries, data processing agreement, privacy policy, service level agreement, and incident response documentation. These are typically shared under NDA during vendor onboarding. Our security documentation is designed to satisfy financial services vendor risk management requirements. Average vendor review timeline: 2-4 weeks for mid-sized companies, 6-12 weeks for large banks with extensive vendor risk processes.

Q1. How do I get started with a RegWatch trial?

Contact us via the website or email (hello@carveragents.ai). We'll schedule a 30-minute discovery call to understand your business, regulatory challenges, and intelligence needs. If there's a good fit, we'll set up a customized trial (typically 14-30 days).You'll see real intelligence feeds based on your jurisdictions, products, and strategic priorities. At the end of trial, you decide whether RegWatch delivers the value you need.

Q2. What information do you need for a demo or trial?

Basics: company name, industry segment (fintech/bank/lender/etc.), products/services you offer, jurisdictions where you operate, current regulatory monitoring approach, and key intelligence challenges you're trying to solve. The more specific you can be about your strategic priorities and regulatory pain points, the more customized and valuable we can make your demo/trial. We'll ask these questions during the discovery call, but thinking about them beforehand helps.

Q3. What's included in the trial period?

Full platform access configured for your business, live intelligence alerts based on your profile, onboarding session with your account manager, training on platform features, and ability to invite your team members (typically 3-5 users during trial). You'll see real-time regulatory developments, test the relevance filtering, evaluate the AI analysis quality, and assess integration possibilities. By trial end, you'll know whether RegWatch delivers the strategic intelligence advantage you need.

Q4. How long from trial to go-live if we decide to subscribe?

If you've completed the trial successfully, you're essentially already live - we just convert your trial account to a paid subscription. Contracting typically takes 1-2 weeks (faster for smaller companies, longer for large enterprises with procurement processes). If you need additional configuration (more jurisdictions, API integration, team expansion), that adds 1-2 weeks. Most customers go from "yes, let's do this" to fully operational subscription within 2-4 weeks. Urgency matters - if you have a strategic need, we can accelerate.

Q5. What happens during the onboarding process?

Week 1: Kickoff call to map your strategic priorities, configure monitoring parameters, set up user accounts, and establish delivery channels (Slack, email, API). We build your intelligence profile based on products, jurisdictions, risk appetite, and strategic focus areas.

Week 2: You receive live alerts, provide feedback on relevance, and we fine-tune filtering. Training sessions for different user roles (risk managers, strategy leaders, legal team). We validate integration points if applicable. By the end of week 2, you're independently using RegWatch and your team is trained.

Q6. Can we start with limited scope and expand later?

Yes - this is actually our recommended approach. Start with core jurisdictions and primary products, validate the intelligence quality and business value, then expand to additional markets or business lines. Expansion is easy - just update your monitoring parameters. Pricing typically scales with scope, but we design subscriptions with growth in mind. Better to start focused and successful than try to boil the ocean on day one and get overwhelmed.

Q7. What if RegWatch doesn't work out? Can we cancel?

Standard subscriptions are annual commitments (monthly payment options available). If during the trial period you decide it's not the right fit, you can walk away with no obligation. Post-subscription, we don't have automatic renewals - we reach out 90 days before your term ends to discuss renewal. If you need to cancel mid-term due to business circumstances (e.g., company shutdown, strategic pivot out of financial services), talk to us - we're reasonable. Our goal is long-term partnerships, not trapping customers in contracts.

Q8. Do you offer regulatory landscape assessments or consulting services?

Yes, as a professional services add-on. We can conduct: (1) Regulatory landscape assessments for specific markets or products (what regulations apply, what's changing, how competitors are positioned); (2) Market entry regulatory analysis (what licenses needed, regulatory timing, compliance requirements); (3) M&A due diligence (target company's regulatory risk profile); (4) Custom research projects (deep-dive analysis on specific regulatory topics). These are scoped as one-time projects or ongoing retainers, priced separately from RegWatch subscriptions.

Q9. Can I get a personalized demo for my business?

Yes - our demos are always customized. We don't show generic slides; we configure RegWatch with your business profile before the demo so you see what intelligence would look like for YOUR company. We walk through regulatory developments relevant to your markets, show how AI analysis addresses your specific challenges, and demonstrate how RegWatch integrates with your workflows. Demos typically take 30-45 minutes and include Q&A. Book via our website or email hello@carveragents.ai.

Q10. Who should be involved in the evaluation process from our team?

Recommended stakeholders: (1) Primary user (risk manager or strategy leader who will use daily); (2) Budget owner (whoever approves the purchase); (3) Technical stakeholder (if API integration matters); (4) Executives (if strategic intelligence will inform leadership decisions). Too many stakeholders slows down evaluation; too few misses important perspectives. Ideal evaluation team is 3-5 people representing different functions (risk, strategy, legal, operations) who will actually use the intelligence.

Q11. What results can customers expect in the first 90 days?

Common outcomes: (1) Time savings - saving 10-15 hours/week previously spent on manual monitoring; (2) Coverage expansion - discovering 30-50% more relevant regulatory developments than were caught manually; (3) Strategic wins - early visibility into 2-3 regulatory developments that inform business decisions (product launches, market entry, partnership strategy); (4) Team alignment - shared intelligence platform eliminates fragmented monitoring and missed handoffs. (5) Catching critical regulatory changes that would have been missed entirely with manual monitoring.

Q12. How do I contact you?

Website: carveragents.ai/solutions (secure early access form)
Email: hello@carveragents.ai

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/carver-agents